Beginning: In 2007, the then-Secretary of State of the United States, Harry Reid, expressed his fascination with a series of reports detailing UFO sightings originating from the country’s armed forces.
The discourse surrounding this phenomenon gained momentum following the publication of a comprehensive account in The New Yorker, authored by Gideo Lewis-Kraus. This account delved into observations, investigations, opinions, and commentaries related to UFOs.
While the release of this extensive report sparked discussions among high-ranking officials in the US government, experts emphasized that the identification of flying objects (UFOs) does not necessarily imply the presence of extraterrestrial spacecraft.
Why a TɾaʋaiƖ group?
In The New Yorker’s report titled “How Peptago Began Taking UFOs Seriously,” Lewis-Kraus delves into the timeline of alien UFO sightings, the scientific scrutiny they underwent, the intellectual intrigue they ignited, and the societal shifts they triggered.
The report outlines how the surge in UFO sightings during the Cold War era fueled the belief that the United States needed complete control of its airspace.
As a result, the CIA undertook investigations into UFO reports, closely monitored civilian UFO research groups, revoked the special investigative status granted to UFOs, and disseminated messages aimed at discrediting the discussions surrounding them.
Lewis-Kraus clarifies that a significant portion of these cases found plausible explanations through cutting-edge military technology, meteorological experiments, or even celestial occurrences. However, there remained a subset of observations that defied conventional explanation.
Certain researchers have managed to delve deeper into numerous observations, especially those stemming from the anxious backdrop of the Cold War and the ambivalence surrounding technological advancements. Yet, there still exists a set of phenomena that remain fairly inexplicable, particularly those witnessed by professional observers like commercial and air force pilots, as well as a multitude of eyewitnesses.
These cases created quite a sensation when they initially occurred, even resulting in widely publicized legal actions and court orders.
The resurgence of interest in UFOs can, in part, be attributed to the cyclical patterns of popular culture, where there is a periodic fascination with similar subjects that eventually wane in public discourse. However, the efforts of influential figures like Leslie Kea, as elucidated in the previously mentioned report, have contributed to a growing interest in the unexplained aerial phenomena among mainstream readers and high-ranking government officials in the United States.
Case examples explained
Several credible sources of UFO information have been made available to the public. Notable events include “Roswell Bay” in 1980, where numerous Air Force officers had a close encounter with a UFO and even recorded it on audio.
In 1976, near Thérapie, witnesses reported a “luminous diamond” emitting various colors and disrupting radio communications. Much of these accounts are corroborated by radar data, audio recordings of conversations, satellite images, and APD photos.
The notable deficiency in evidence primarily lies in the scarcity of clear visual data and close-up images, particularly considering that many eyewitness reports claim close proximity to the objects they observed or encountered.
What the experts think
In a segment from the “60 Metes” show, a pilot reveals that he had daily sightings of UFOs for two years. This has led experts to suggest that such accounts may bolster the hypothesis that UFOs could be mistaken and not entirely explainable.
Many specialists argue that the majority of UFO sightings can be rationalized using terrestrial or celestial phenomena, with weather balloons equipped with radiant reflectors often being the primary culprits.
In the Atlantic, author Maɾia Kore contends that any potential traces of extraterrestrial life would likely originate from celestial bodies within our atmosphere.
Indeed, it is logical to assume that there must be a natural explanation in accordance with the laws of physics for these UFO phenomena.
A phenomenon that can be explained or remains undetermined does not necessarily imply an extraterrestrial origin.
Nevertheless, these phenomena warrant thorough examination and investigation, and it’s widely believed that future inquiries will likely move in this direction.